<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://desedo.com/blog/slang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://desedo.com/blog/slang/</link>
	<description>a blog by desedo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desedo Films &#124; Des Temps : Topshop</title>
		<link>http://desedo.com/blog/slang/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Desedo Films &#124; Des Temps : Topshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desedo.com/blog/slang/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>[...] UK fashionista fave TopShop just opened it&#8217;s first NYC store. Wheatpaste adverts abound. And next to some of the official ads, lurk posters that seem to poke fun at spokesmodel Kate Moss and the brand. Yet they are rather harmless and in keeping with both the brand spirit and aesthetic.  So it makes me wonder if the snarky posters are in fact from the agency running the campaign. Are they creating their own point/counterpoint in an effort to further place the brand within the streetscape dialogue? Is it an effort to make TopShop look all the more fresh and that people care enough about it to talk it out? And if so, where does this fall within the rules of slang and advertising? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UK fashionista fave TopShop just opened it&#8217;s first NYC store. Wheatpaste adverts abound. And next to some of the official ads, lurk posters that seem to poke fun at spokesmodel Kate Moss and the brand. Yet they are rather harmless and in keeping with both the brand spirit and aesthetic.  So it makes me wonder if the snarky posters are in fact from the agency running the campaign. Are they creating their own point/counterpoint in an effort to further place the brand within the streetscape dialogue? Is it an effort to make TopShop look all the more fresh and that people care enough about it to talk it out? And if so, where does this fall within the rules of slang and advertising? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiss my black ads</title>
		<link>http://desedo.com/blog/slang/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiss my black ads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desedo.com/blog/slang/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>clever ads. the new McD thing, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clever ads. the new McD thing, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dp</title>
		<link>http://desedo.com/blog/slang/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>dp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 06:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desedo.com/blog/slang/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>That Akademics ad was soooo church.  This new McDonald&#039;s ad using a fake R &amp; B song to boost their Chicken McNuggets is also a banger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Akademics ad was soooo church.  This new McDonald&#8217;s ad using a fake R &amp; B song to boost their Chicken McNuggets is also a banger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faris</title>
		<link>http://desedo.com/blog/slang/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>faris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desedo.com/blog/slang/#comment-351</guid>
		<description>brain?

good to know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brain?</p>
<p>good to know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://desedo.com/blog/slang/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://desedo.com/blog/slang/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>The cool thing about the Gossip Girl thing is that not only does the general demographic get it, but there is a deeper (did I really just use that word when talking about this show?) level of understanding amongst the people who watch it religiously: the entire narration in the series coms from a blog called Gossip Girl that reports on the Upper East Side&#039;s whispers; they use online vernacular frequently in the show. Hu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cool thing about the Gossip Girl thing is that not only does the general demographic get it, but there is a deeper (did I really just use that word when talking about this show?) level of understanding amongst the people who watch it religiously: the entire narration in the series coms from a blog called Gossip Girl that reports on the Upper East Side&#8217;s whispers; they use online vernacular frequently in the show. Hu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

